DMARC Reports · comparison

EasyDMARC and Conbool — side by side.

If you want to evaluate DMARC aggregate reports, it pays to look at the differences directly. This page compares publicly verifiable points — as of May 2026.

In three sentences

What matters.

EasyDMARC is an international DMARC platform with a free tier, paid plans and a threat-intelligence layer. Conbool DMARC Reports is the DMARC analysis as an add-on to MailGuard, exclusively EU-hosted and without a separate license. Which fits best depends on whether you are already using MailGuard or are looking for a standalone DMARC platform.

The five most common questions, side by side.

Every statement about EasyDMARC links to a public source. Every Conbool claim is verifiable in a demo.

Where are my DMARC reports hosted?

Conbool DMARC Reports

Exclusively in EU data centres on ISO 27001-certified infrastructure. Contract party and data processor is Conbool GmbH in Germany. The DPA under GDPR Art. 28 names the concrete data location.

EasyDMARCEasyDMARC

EasyDMARC is a US-organised company. According to its Trust Center and Privacy Policy, processing and hosting are primarily outside the EU. A dedicated EU region is not stated in the public sources.

Source: easydmarc.com — Trust Center and Privacy Policy. Please confirm the concrete processing region with the vendor.

Why it matters: DMARC reports contain header data and sending sources of your domain — that can be a point in GDPR assessments. EU hosting makes documentation for data protection officers easier.

How broad is the feature scope?

Conbool DMARC Reports

RUA aggregate reports, forensic reports and Legit/Suspicious classification. The module is part of the MailGuard bundle — no separate DMARC tier. BIMI preparation is on the roadmap and can already be configured on request.

EasyDMARCEasyDMARC

EasyDMARC offers SPF/DKIM/DMARC monitoring, a threat-intelligence layer and BIMI hosting. Feature depth and available modules depend on the plan you book.

Source: easydmarc.com — product and pricing pages. Verify the exact feature scope per plan with the vendor.

Why it matters: both solutions deliver the DMARC core function. Conbool is more tightly tied to the MailGuard mail flow, EasyDMARC is broader and vendor-neutral.

How is pricing structured?

Conbool DMARC Reports

Free as an add-on for MailGuard customers. No additional per-domain pricing, no tiering by report volume. The contract term follows MailGuard.

EasyDMARCEasyDMARC

EasyDMARC offers a free tier with limits and several paid plans, billed per domain or by feature scope. Higher tiers unlock forensic reports, BIMI hosting and threat intelligence.

Source: easydmarc.com — pricing page. Current tiers and limits via the vendor.

Why it matters: if you are running MailGuard anyway, DMARC reporting comes at no additional cost. If you want DMARC standalone and do not use MailGuard, a dedicated DMARC platform fits better.

How deep is the analysis?

Conbool DMARC Reports

RUA XML reports are parsed, normalised and classified by sending source. Legitimate senders (own infrastructure, marketing tools, providers) are separated from suspicious sources. The analysis runs directly in the MailGuard console.

EasyDMARCEasyDMARC

EasyDMARC offers similar classification logic with aggregate and forensic reports plus a threat-intelligence overlay. The depth of enrichment scales with the booked plan.

Source: easydmarc.com — feature description of aggregate/forensic reports and threat intelligence.

Why it matters: the core question — who has sent under my domain and did it pass DMARC — is handled by both platforms. The detail depth per sender differs mainly in higher tiers.

How does DMARC integrate with the mail flow?

Conbool DMARC Reports

Conbool DMARC Reports is integrated with MailGuard. Detected issues — for example unauthorised senders or broken SPF/DKIM configuration — are linked to concrete policy recommendations for your mail flow. A MailGuard rule can be derived directly from the report.

EasyDMARCEasyDMARC

EasyDMARC is a standalone DMARC reporting platform. The insights are translated manually by the administrator into your own email security solution.

Source: easydmarc.com — product architecture, standalone reporting platform.

Why it matters: DMARC insights are only as good as their implementation in the mail flow. Anyone already using MailGuard gets a direct bridge with Conbool — without reports landing in a separate console.

Migration checklist

What to watch for when migrating away from EasyDMARC.

A DMARC provider switch is technically uncritical because DMARC reports are distributed via DNS tag. Four steps are enough for a clean transition.

  1. 1. Review the current DMARC record in DNS

    Read out the current DMARC TXT record of your domain. Note the rua= tag and any ruf= tag with the recipient addresses currently configured (usually EasyDMARC mailbox IDs). Record the p= policy (none/quarantine/reject).

  2. 2. Add the Conbool endpoint to rua= (run in parallel)

    Add the Conbool report mailbox to the rua= tag. DMARC allows multiple recipients separated by commas. EasyDMARC and Conbool receive the same reports in parallel from then on — no gap, no sender changes needed.

  3. 3. Compare data after two weeks, then remove EasyDMARC

    After 14 days compare volumes and sender lists in both consoles. Once the numbers are plausible, remove the EasyDMARC recipient from the rua= tag. Conbool is then the sole DMARC recipient.

  4. 4. Terminate or let the EasyDMARC subscription expire

    Once no more data comes into EasyDMARC, you can terminate the contract or let it expire. Export historical EasyDMARC reports beforehand if audit requirements demand it.

These steps apply to typical DMARC setups. For especially complex mail flow architectures (multiple subsidiaries, group subdomains) we review the rua= distribution in the consult.

Decision aid

When Conbool, when EasyDMARC.

Conbool DMARC Reports fits when …

  • You already use MailGuard or are evaluating it, and want DMARC as a free add-on.
  • You need EU hosting and a German contract party with a DPA under GDPR Art. 28.
  • You want to translate DMARC insights directly into MailGuard rules.
  • You want to plan without separate per-domain pricing.

EasyDMARC fits when …

  • You operate an existing standalone DMARC solution with established workflows.
  • You do not want to use MailGuard and need a vendor-neutral DMARC platform.
  • You have already budgeted multi-domain pricing and can stay on the free or low-cost plan.
  • You actively use the vendor's BIMI hosting.

Also compared

Further email-security alternatives and cross-comparisons.

EasyDMARC is often weighed up against Mimecast, Proofpoint and dmarcian. Here are the direct comparison pages.

Frequently asked

See Conbool DMARC Reports in your own setup.

30-minute demo. DMARC analysis with EU hosting, integrated into MailGuard.

Sources and fairness note

Statements about EasyDMARC rely exclusively on publicly accessible sources: easydmarc.com — product, pricing and Trust Center pages and the Privacy Policy. Claims about internal processes or architecture details not publicly substantiated are avoided. Statements about Conbool rely on our product documentation and contractual commitments.

As of May 2026. For your final decision we recommend you ask both vendors directly about the points relevant to you and get statements confirmed in writing.

EasyDMARC is a trademark of EasyDMARC Inc. Conbool is a trademark of Conbool GmbH. This page is an editorial comparison — not official EasyDMARC material.