
Choosing the right Email Security Gateway is critical for business communication security. This comparison shows the most important criteria and typical pitfalls.
Die neuesten Beiträge aus unserem Blog.

E‑Mail‑Signaturen zentral steuern, rechtssichere Disclaimer einbinden und den Unternehmensauftritt in Outlook vereinheitlichen – ohne manuelle Frickelei. Das Conbool Disclaimer Add‑in ist ab sofort…

Vergessen Sie komplizierte Portale und HTML-Anhänge. Erfahren Sie, wie Sie mit Conbool SecureMail E-Mails in M365 adaptiv und BSI-konform verschlüsseln.
Choosing the right Email Security Gateway is one of the most important IT security decisions for businesses. But the market is confusing: dozens of providers promise "comprehensive protection," yet the actual features, data processing, and pricing models differ considerably.
This guide helps you make the right decision — with a structured evaluation matrix and the key questions you should ask every provider.
Not every gateway protects equally well. Look for:
Question for the provider: "Can you show a recent incident where your system detected a zero-day attack?"
Not all encryption is created equal:
| Criterion | Important | Why |
|---|---|---|
| S/MIME support | ✅ | Standard for government agencies and law firms |
| PGP support | ✅ | Standard for maximum security |
| Centralized certificate management | ✅ | Without central management, implementation fails |
| Policy-based encryption | ✅ | Automation without user interaction |
| Fallback mechanisms | ✅ | What happens when the other side doesn't support S/MIME? |
More on the differences: S/MIME vs. PGP: Comparison for Businesses
Details: Email Disclaimer Management for Microsoft 365
For GDPR compliance, the following is critical:
Also read: Digital Sovereignty in Email Encryption
Use this checklist during evaluation:
Many providers list impressive feature lists, but the actual implementation is often superficial. Always test yourself with a proof-of-concept phase.
Some gateways bind you to proprietary formats or workflows. Look for standard protocols (SMTP, S/MIME, PGP) and easy migration.
Gateways that process emails in the US carry a GDPR risk — even with the EU-US Data Privacy Framework. For maximum security, choose EU hosting and digital sovereignty.
A gateway that takes weeks to set up becomes a project killer. Cloud-native solutions like Conbool are ready in under an hour.
Conbool meets all 8 comparison criteria:
| Criterion | Conbool |
|---|---|
| Threat detection | ✅ Multi-layered with AI (MailGuard) |
| Encryption | ✅ S/MIME + PGP automatic (SecureMail) |
| DLP | ✅ Pattern-based, granular rules |
| Disclaimers | ✅ Dynamic templates (Disclaimer) |
| Microsoft 365 | ✅ Native MX integration |
| Data sovereignty | ✅ EU-only, Made in Germany |
| Support | ✅ Local-language, guaranteed SLA |
| Pricing | ✅ Transparent per mailbox |
That depends on your requirements. For German and European businesses with GDPR and NIS2 requirements, a gateway with EU hosting, automatic encryption, and local-language support is crucial.
Cloud-based gateways typically cost between 2 and 10 euros per mailbox/month. Many providers offer free trial periods — Conbool offers 30 days.
Further reading: